GABF by the Numbers: Coffee, ‘Session’ Beer and Winner Geography

Over the weekend, the Brewers Association announced their annual list of winners from judging at the Great American Beer Festival, offering the best of American beer out of 7,923 entries across 98 categories.

Among the joy of all the winners, there was also some confusion. With 105 entries, Fruited American-Style Sour Ale was decided to not have one good enough for a gold. Session IPA awarded its top medal to a beer with 5.8% ABV. The first-place finisher for American-style IPA went to a beer its brewery does and does not list as a pale ale. Whoops.

Even if there are some confusing aspects of what was decided, there are still worthy numbers to crunch (and overanalyze).

To start, I pulled 10 of the most-entered categories from 2017. These were selected for having the highest number of entries but also being the most consistent in category description itself, as the BA has gone from 84 to 98 style categories in the last five years, dividing up and switching how some style categories are classified.

 Entries by Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
American-Style IPA 252 279 336 312 408
Imperial IPA 149 135 208 211 221
Coffee Beer* 92 116 149 168 203
American-style Pale Ale 124 145 160 157 199
American-style Strong Pale Ale 120 134 134 169 182
Wood and Barrel-aged Strong Beer 117 107 179 175 175
Wood and Barrel-aged Strong Stout 89 109 128 131 154
German-style Kolsch 60 84 111 111 154
Herb and Spice Beer 134 150 142 114 145
German-style Pilsner 56 75 100 115 145

Coffee Beer

A note on the coffee beer category, of which I’ve previously covered extensively: this year it was split into two categories for the first time with “Coffee Beer” and “Coffee Stout or Porter.” Like the quirkiness of other categories mentioned above, this had a strange effect in that it didn’t really change anything. Of the six medals awarded between the two, five were milk stouts, with the lone holdout Alaskan’s Heritage Coffee Brown Ale, which won gold in the broader “Coffee Beer” category. The silver and bronze finishers in that section were both “golden” milk stouts.

Given that, I lumped all the coffee beer entries into one category, even though I realize not all beers entered were likely stouts or porters, however it does pique my interest how many entries were some version of those styles. Overall, the category of Coffee Beer is fascinating to me because it’s one of the most popular at GABF while always staying rather niche commercially. It’s easy to see when taking those 10 categories above and ranking them based on five-year growth trends:

2013-2017 Growth
German-style Pilsner 158.9%
German-style Kolsch 156.7%
Coffee Beer 120.7%
Wood and Barrel-aged Strong Stout 73%
American-Style India Pale Ale 61.9%
American-style Pale Ale 60.5%
American-style Strong Pale Ale 51.7%
Wood and Barrel-aged Strong Beer 49.6%
Imperial IPA 48.3%
Herb and Spice Beer 8.2%

Probably didn’t expect those top-three? The coffee beer selection may seem a bit out there, but for those of us who think a little too much about beer, the rapid growth of entries in the pilsner and kolsch categories aren’t a surprise as more enthusiasts talk about “sessionable” beers and the growth of lagers. But before we start declaring for the umpteenth time these beers are the “next IPA” (nothing is the “next IPA”), let’s please note that it can be part of the overall growth of the industry given the number of new breweries coming online, the number of those breweries who are creating beers to attract new (read: macro) drinkers, and act as a result of established breweries creating and entering judging. Not included here is Golden or Blonde Ale, which has gone from 69 to 126 entries over the 2013-2017 timespan.

Sessionable Styles

In early 2016, BA economist Bart Watson noted: “Differentation is important in any niche, value-added market, because you need to give consumers a reason to pay more for your good than for a lower-priced good produced with greater scale.

All that said, there is also plenty to point at that the increase in GABF entries is also part of the overall growing trend of growth in these styles.

At the end of last year, Watson pointed out that golden, blonde, pilsner and pale lager categories represented just over 33% of BA-defined craft incremental growth in IRI-scanned data for the year. In 2016, craft pilsners grew 19.3% in dollar sales in IRI-tracked dollar sales, while golden ales (48.2%) and pale lagers (9.8%) also increased.

So while there are larger trends at play in relation to the potential popularity and creation of these styles/brands, it’s worth considering what details we may be able to take away from winning entries over the years.

For example, here are the top finishers in the German Kolsch category over the past five years:

Gold: Leinenkugel’s Canoe Paddler, Jacob Leinenkugel Brewing Co., Chippewa Falls, WI
Silver: Tailgater Kölsch, Flat Tail Brewing Co., Corvallis, OR
Bronze: Potential Blonde, Kinetic Brewing Co., Lancaster, CA
Gold: Laimas Kolsch, FATE Brewing Co., Boulder, CO
Silver: Sun Dazed, Old Town Brewing Co., Portland, OR
Bronze: Canoe Paddler, Leinenkugel Brewing Co., Chippewa Falls, WI
Gold: Chuckanut Kolsch Style, Chuckanut Brewery, Bellingham, WA
Silver: Colorado Kölsch, Steamworks Brewing Co., Durango, CO
Bronze: Friar Chuck, Black Bottle Brewery, Fort Collins, CO
Gold: Light of Cologne, Ornery Beer Co., Woodbridge, VA
Silver: Vacation, Daredevil Brewing Co., Indianapolis, IN
Bronze: Lü, Solemn Oath Brewery, Naperville, IL
Gold: Chuckanut Kolsch Style, Chuckanut Brewery, Bellingham, WA
Silver: Seafarer, Three Weavers Brewing Co., Inglewood, CA
Bronze: Downhill Kölsch, Elk Mountain Brewing Co., Parker, CO

For those familiar with the history and pedigree of Leinenkugel Brewing when it comes to German beers, its wins in 2013 and 2014 could be expected. What catches my eye, in a very basic way, is how the size and focus of winning breweries have changed. Geographically, 2016 shows that Colorado and the West Coast don’t have a stranglehold on the style, but there’s also a collection of breweries that specialize in lager (or in this case, lager-ish) beers as well as breweries who are more known for making big ales, like Solemn Oath. Perhaps this can connect with the above guess about breweries expanding their offerings by sake of growing as well as seeking broader customer interest.

In a minimal way, this also shows in recent history of the German Pilsner category.

Gold: Pivo, Firestone Walker Brewing Co., Paso Robles, CA
Silver: Pilsner, Marble Brewery, Albuquerque, NM
Bronze: Sunshine Pils, Tröegs Brewing Co., Hershey, PA
Gold: Pivo, Firestone Walker Brewing Co., Paso Robles, CA
Silver: STS Pils, Russian River Brewing Co., Santa Rosa, CA
Bronze: Tiny Bomb, Wiseacre Brewing Co., Memphis, TN
Gold: Pivo, Firestone Walker Brewing Co., Paso Robles, CA
Silver: Pilsner, pFriem Family Brewers, Hood River, OR
Bronze: Pilsner, Dry Dock Brewing Co., Aurora, CO
Gold: Industry, The Austin Beer Garden Brewing Co., Austin, TX
Silver: Bosque Lager, Bosque Brewing Co., Albuquerque, NM
Bronze: Lokahi Pilsner, Kohola Brewery, Lahaina, HI
Gold: Zoigl-Pils, Zoiglhaus Brewing Co., Portland, OR
Silver: Pilsner, Dry Dock Brewing Co. – South Dock, Aurora, CO
Bronze: Pivo, Firestone Walker Brewing Co., Paso Robles, CA

Pivo’s Place

Looking past Firestone Walker’s vice grip on medals, I see something like Austin Beer Garden’s win in 2016 as a good anecdote for the changing geography of success with styles, as well as a bit of evidence for the (subjective) claim of Austin as the “Pilsner Capital of America.” Austin Beer Garden also won gold this year in the American-Style Pilsener or International-Style Pilsener category, for what it’s worth.

But let’s talk about Firestone’s Pivo. Since its debut in 2013, it’s placed in four out of five years, including three gold medals and this year’s bronze. That’s a hell of an accomplishment that caused me to (foolishly) ask on Twitter as I considered what that meant, is it the best beer in America? Everyone @’d me.

The reason behind asking the question, aside for the fact I enjoy the discussion, is that kind of success isn’t really seen outside of something like the American-style light lager category, where macro brands dominated for years. So of course it’s a fun excuse to pose the question, if only due to its success in GABF and inclusion in my 2014 normalization analysis of that year’s “best beer” by writers from around the country, which showed Pivo to be one of the most beloved beers among those that cover the industry that year.

A second tier of reasoning behind asking the question is its connection to things inherently popular (but not rooted) in American beer drinking culture, where the pilsner or something close to it has long been the go-to choice for the vast majority of Americans. Plus, you know, hops, thanks to its “West Coast dry-hopping twist.” A light, sessionable beer with some distinctive hop flavor? Sounds pretty spot on to what a large collection of Americans might seek out, beer geek or not.

Before you take to social media to tell me what an idiot I am for asking a question about a “best” beer, please take a look at all the other writing I’ve done on why calling a beer “best” is foolish. I don’t think Pivo Pils is the best beer in America and never said as much there or here – beer is an experiential good that can’t be quantified in this fashion, no matter what RateBeer, Beer Advocate or Untappd users tell us. However, in terms of award success and its place within America’s flavor preferences, I simply think it’s a fun discussion to have regarding Pivo’s place among our beer zeitgeist. Nothing more than that.

Geography of Winners

Kudos to Carla Jean Lauter for this handy map:

As a post-GABF look, here’s a heatmap of winners (click to enlarge):

In all, nine states won 10 or more awards and the top-10 states won 203 of 296, or 68.6%. Twenty-eight other states accounted for the remaining 93 awards.

At the top, California (57) and Colorado (38) accounted for nearly a third of all medals awarded in this year’s festival. Here’s how the rest of the top-10 looked:

Total Awards
Percent of Total Medals
California 57 19.3
Colorado 38 12.8
Texas 21 7.1
Oregon 17 5.7
Pennsylvania 16 5.4
North Carolina* 15 5.1
Illinois 10 3.4
Indiana 10 3.4
Washington 10 3.4
Ohio 9 3

Of note, I shifted one medal – a gold for Appalachian Mountain Brewery – from New Hampshire to the brewery’s home state of North Carolina. AMB has brewing partnerships with Craft Brew Alliance/AB to produce some of their brands.

Part of the discrepancy between the states listed above and everyone else can be seen in the context of Carla’s map. It costs money to send beer to GABF, let alone a desire to do so, and there are many that choose to not take part for a variety of reasons. States like California and Colorado benefit from two clear advantages: California has more than 600 breweries and Colorado, with about 350, benefits from both number of potential entries aided by close proximity of bringing or sending beer to Denver.

For beer travelers, the above heat map certainly gives you an idea of where to travel, but if you’re in either California or Colorado, you’ve got 38 different cities with a GABF award-winning brewery in the Golden State and 18 from the Centennial State.

Bryan Roth
“Don’t drink to get drunk. Drink to enjoy life.” — Jack Kerouac


5 thoughts on “GABF by the Numbers: Coffee, ‘Session’ Beer and Winner Geography

  1. Interesting analysis as always, particularly the observation about the growth of kolsch and pilsner. Do you think it will be harder within those somewhat narrowly defined styles for breweries to differentiate their product from the competition, and if so how do you think that will influence their proliferation?

    I’m also curious if you know how the category Strong Pale Ale is differentiated from Pale Ale and IPA? I’ve tried the gold medal winning Hubert by Melvin Brewing and I don’t recall it being noticeably different from an IPA.

    1. As luck would have it, I actually had Hubert last week at a Melvin brewpub in Bellingham, WA. It was great, but also agree that its difference from an IPA is minimal, aside from what an expected ABV would be, I suppose. But the experience was most certainly parallel.

      The golden/kolsch/pilsner/etc. area is an interesting one, as differentiation really is based on brand awareness and identity, when put into context of flavor profile and creating new consumers. Standing out at that point could then be based on other aspects of familiarity, whether a person is geographically close to the brewery, knows of the brewery, etc. In layman’s terms, we’re talking about a “beer tasting beer,” so these things, along with something like price point, likely matter. At least, that’s how I’d guess.

      1. Sure geography and brand identity are powerful differentiators in terms of craft beer in general, but in many markets there’s plenty of competition with similar geography, back stories, etc. With IPAs brewers have gotten quite a bit of mileage out of using new hop varieties, blending in fruits, changing the yeast attributes or the color of the malts. It all goes under the umbrella of IPA because the central feature is a big new world hop profile.

        Now if you take a kolsch and make it with Citra, Simcoe and Mosaic hops isn’t just an American Pale Ale? If you take that approach to a Pilsner it starts to look like an IPL to me. On the other hand if you stick to European hops then you can start to imagine how pilsners and kolschs could be differentiated from each other and from APA/IPL/IPA. Victory’s Prima Pils is one such beer that comes to mind.

  2. “The reason behind asking the question, aside for the fact I enjoy the discussion, is that kind of success isn’t really seen outside of something like the American-style light lager category…”

    Quietly Iron Hill Brewery (a chair no less) has had a ton of success with their RIS at GABF and all over. It is a stunningly well regarded beer in a style that is loved by many a beer geek.

  3. Colorado’s “38th” actually belongs to Washington, D.C.: the Hefeweizen of the talented, longtime DC-area brewer, Travis Tedrow, who brews in the shadow of Nats Park, at the Navy Yard Gordon Biersch.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close